Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Bert is an atom-for-atom duplicate of Ernie with no relev... — Carmelics
    Home/Moral Responsibility
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→Bert acts unfreely and is not morally responsible for his actions.

    Bert is an atom-for-atom duplicate of Ernie with no relevant difference in their circumstances, deliberation, or action.

    Moral ResponsibilityPersonal Identity
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Moral ResponsibilityPersonal Identity

    Connections

    1 topic

    Free Will & Foreknowledge3 linked

    Related

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Moral Responsibility
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    Bert acts unfreely and is not morally responsible for his actions.Ernie acts unfreely because he was created by a goddess to act in a specific way...If there is no relevant difference between two agents, they must be evaluated th...

    Similar

    Bert is an atom-for-atom duplicate of Ernie who was not created by a g...85%After fission, neither Y nor Z is numerically identical to X.81%There is no relevant difference between Ernie and Bert with respect to...80%Therefore C and D must be identical, contradicting the hypothesis that...80%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: incompatibilism-arguments
    View source passageHide passage
    To many people, it seems intuitively clear that Ernie acts unfreely and is for that reason not morally responsible for what he does. But if that’s right, it looks like this version of the Manipulation argument succeeds. For consider this: Ernie has an atom-for-atom duplicate, Bert, a normal guy in every way, exactly like Ernie (ideally self-controlled, rational, etc.) except for the fact that he was not created by a goddess. Bert finds himself in circumstances exactly like the ones Ernie is in,

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective