Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Disjunctivist accounts (McDowell, Hinton) demonstrate tha... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→The basis for the arising of cognitive awareness is internal to the mental stream, not external physical objects

    Disjunctivist accounts (McDowell, Hinton) demonstrate that veridical perception and hallucination are fundamentally different states, not unified by a common internal factor.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    1 reason for
    1 reason against

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Veridical perception involves direct mind-independent objects; hallucination involves no such objects. This ontological difference is fundamental.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.If perception and hallucination shared a common internal factor, we couldn't explain why perception reliably tracks reality while hallucination doesn't.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Phenomenal indistinguishability doesn't entail metaphysical similarity; identical experiences can arise from fundamentally different causal relations.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Disjunctivism struggles to explain introspective access: hallucinating subjects cannot introspectively detect the absence of real objects.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Evolution shaped perception and hallucination through similar neural mechanisms, suggesting a common internal representational structure underlies both.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.The unity of perceptual science requires treating perception and hallucination as continuous states differing in causal origin, not fundamental kind.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    Connections

    2 topics

    Consciousness & Mind1 linkedPerception1 linked

    Related

    Disjunctivism struggles to explain introspective access: hallucinating subjects ...Evolution shaped perception and hallucination through similar neural mechanisms,...If perception and hallucination shared a common internal factor, we couldn't exp...Phenomenal indistinguishability doesn't entail metaphysical similarity; identica...
    +3 moreShow less
    The basis for the arising of cognitive awareness is internal to the mental strea...The unity of perceptual science requires treating perception and hallucination a...Veridical perception involves direct mind-independent objects; hallucination inv...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    2 (1 for, 1 against)
    Edits
    1 edit