Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Errors on occasions of clear and distinct perception woul... — Carmelics
    Home/Problem of Evil
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→The theodicy establishes not only what errors God can allow but also what errors God cannot allow

    Errors on occasions of clear and distinct perception would be God's fault, not the perceiver's

    Against an aspect of GodProblem of Evil
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Problem of EvilAgainst an aspect of God

    Connections

    4 topics

    Against a future action of God1 linked

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Problem of Evil
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    Against an attribute of God
    1 linked
    Truth & Knowledge1 linked
    Free Will & Foreknowledge1 linked

    Related

    God, being all-perfect, cannot be the cause of errorThe theodicy establishes not only what errors God can allow but also what errors...Theodicy explains the kinds of error God can permit (those resulting from the pe...

    Similar

    The claim that 'we are justified in believing that the As we haven't o...75%Rowe's claim that 'if we observe many As and note that all of them are...73%Theodicy explains the kinds of error God can permit (those resulting f...73%There may be different observations (e.g., experiences that seem to be...73%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: descartes-epistemology
    View source passageHide passage
    Not only is the theodicy used to explain the kinds of error God can allow, it serves to clarify the kinds of error God cannot allow. From the latter arises a proof of the C&D Rule. God can allow errors that are my fault, but not errors that would be God’s fault. On occasions when my perception is clear and distinct, my assent is involuntary and thus not a result of a misuse of my freewill. In such cases, assent is a necessary consequence of my cognitive nature – a point made in many passages

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective