Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    F = G if and only if for all x, Fx if and only if Gx. — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Philosophy of Language
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Connected to 2 discussions

    Supports→If concepts F and G are distinct concepts, then F and G are not materially equivalent.
    Supports→If concepts F and G are not materially equivalent, then F and G are distinct concepts.

    F = G if and only if for all x, Fx if and only if Gx.

    Modality & PossibilityPhilosophy of Language
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Philosophy of LanguageModality & Possibility

    Related

    If concepts F and G are distinct concepts, then F and G are not materially equiv...If concepts F and G are not materially equivalent, then F and G are distinct con...In an extensional model of concepts, material equivalence of F and G is both a n...

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Philosophy of Language
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.

    Similar

    φ ∈ TWO PLAYER SAT if and only if φ ∈ TQBF85%The Main Theorem establishes that Γ ⊨_MSL φ if and only if Trans(Γ)∪Π ...81%If 'Sometimes, if every A is B, then not every C is D' is true, then '...80%Assuming 'Always, if every A is B, then every C is D' holds, if 'Never...79%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: frege-theorem
    View source passageHide passage
    To analyze the inconsistency in more detail, consider an extensional model of concepts, in which the material equivalence of concepts \(F\) and \(G\) serves as both necessary and sufficient conditions for the identity of \(F\) and \(G\), i.e., in which \(F = G \equiv \forall x(Fx \equiv Gx)\). So, given this understanding, if it is not the case that \(F\) and \(G\) are materially equivalent, then \(F\) and \(G\) are distinct concepts; and if \(F\) and \(G\) are distinct concepts, then they are

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective