Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    For nameability to pervade knowability, the statement 'an... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Philosophy of Language
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→The pervasion relation cannot be coherently stated for universally positive inferences under the standard definition of pervasion

    For nameability to pervade knowability, the statement 'any locus of absence-of-nameability is not a locus of knowability' must be true

    Philosophy of LanguageTruth & Knowledge
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Philosophy of LanguageTruth & Knowledge

    Connections

    1 topic

    Modality & Possibility1 linked

    Related

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Philosophy of Language
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    Nameability is a universal property, so absence-of-nameability is uninstantiatedStatements containing non-referring expressions are not truth-evaluableThe expression 'locus-of-absence-of-nameability' (unnameable thing) is non-refer...The pervasion relation cannot be coherently stated for universally positive infe...
    +1 moreShow less
    Uninstantiated properties that are not decomposable into simpler instantiated pr...

    Similar

    The expression 'locus-of-absence-of-nameability' (unnameable thing) is...86%Nameability is a universal property, so absence-of-nameability is unin...82%E-knowability requires non-actual knowledge of what is actually the ca...79%E-knowability denies the assumption that if p is known in situation s,...77%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: early-modern-india
    View source passageHide passage
    The Problem of Universally Positive Inference. There are, claim the Nyāya, patterns of legitimate inference in which the property inferred has as its extension the entire domain. Such inference are called ‘kevalānvayin’ or ‘universally positive’ (cf. TS 55). The stock Nyāya example is the inference “This is nameable, because it is knowable”, nameability being regarded as a property of everything. Another example would be “This exists because it is produced”. If such an inference is sound, then i

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective