Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    The expression 'locus-of-absence-of-nameability' (unnamea... — Carmelics
    Home/Philosophy of Language
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→The pervasion relation cannot be coherently stated for universally positive inferences under the standard definition of pervasion

    The expression 'locus-of-absence-of-nameability' (unnameable thing) is non-referring and not decomposable into distinct instantiated properties

    Philosophy of Language
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Philosophy of Language

    Connections

    2 topics

    Truth & Knowledge4 linkedModality & Possibility1 linked

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Philosophy of Language
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.

    Related

    For nameability to pervade knowability, the statement 'any locus of absence-of-n...Nameability is a universal property, so absence-of-nameability is uninstantiatedStatements containing non-referring expressions are not truth-evaluableThe pervasion relation cannot be coherently stated for universally positive infe...
    +1 moreShow less
    Uninstantiated properties that are not decomposable into simpler instantiated pr...

    Similar

    For nameability to pervade knowability, the statement 'any locus of ab...86%Nameability is a universal property, so absence-of-nameability is unin...81%Contradiction: a proposition requiring a non-instantiated property as ...76%Non-existent objects may encode properties without exemplifying them.75%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: early-modern-india
    View source passageHide passage
    The Problem of Universally Positive Inference. There are, claim the Nyāya, patterns of legitimate inference in which the property inferred has as its extension the entire domain. Such inference are called ‘kevalānvayin’ or ‘universally positive’ (cf. TS 55). The stock Nyāya example is the inference “This is nameable, because it is knowable”, nameability being regarded as a property of everything. Another example would be “This exists because it is produced”. If such an inference is sound, then i

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective