Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that God-as-knower is not numerically the same as God-as-known.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
2 perspectives
Reason for 1 of 2
?
1.
In perfect self-knowledge, the knower and known are identical: the intellect in act is the intelligible in act (Aristotle, De Anima III.4).
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Divine intellection is maximally actual and perfect, admitting no real distinction between subject and object of thought.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
If God-as-knower and God-as-known were numerically distinct, God's self-knowledge would be imperfect, contradicting divine simplicity.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reason for 2 of 2
?
1.
Asymmetry in a relation does not entail numerical distinctness of the relata, as a thing can stand in an asymmetric relation to itself (e.g., self-causation in Spinoza).
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
The supporting argument illicitly infers ontological distinction from logical or grammatical distinction in how we describe a single entity.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
There is an essential asymmetry in the knowing relation.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.