Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Gregory of Rimini demonstrated that Ockham's divided-sens... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→All attempts to save meaningful contingency governed by human free will are doomed to failure

    Gregory of Rimini demonstrated that Ockham's divided-sense distinction merely relocates necessity rather than eliminating it, since the power to do otherwise remains counterfactually inert under eternal foreknowledge.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Key Terms

    Counterfactually inert(as describing why Ockham's solution fails according to Gregory)
    Unable to make a difference to what would have happened in imaginary situations—basically, it doesn't actually give you real freedom even though it seems to.
    Divided-sense distinction(as Ockham's attempted solution to the free will problem)
    Ockham's strategy of splitting a statement into two different meanings to avoid a logical problem—like saying 'God knows that you will choose freely' can mean either 'God knows your choice is fixed' or 'God knows you could have chosen differently.'
    Eternal foreknowledge(as the theological background creating the free will problem)
    God's ability to know everything that will happen in the future, from outside of time, before it actually occurs.
    Free will problem(as the underlying philosophical debate)
    The puzzle of how human free choice can exist if God already knows what we will do—if God knows your future choice, does that mean you're not really free to choose differently?

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Explore a random proposition
    Start fresh with something unrelated.
    Gregory of Rimini(as a historical figure challenging Ockham's ideas)
    A medieval philosopher (1300-1358) who carefully examined arguments about free will and God's knowledge, often pointing out hidden problems in other philosophers' solutions.
    Ockham (William of Ockham)(as the originator of the mental language theory being discussed)
    A medieval philosopher (1287-1347) known for the principle that simple explanations are better than complicated ones, and for developing theories about how language and thought connect to meaning.
    Power to do otherwise(as used in discussions of free will)
    The ability to have made a different choice in the exact same situation—a traditional requirement for being morally responsible.
    knowledge(Distinguished from mere true belief, which may be the product of indoctrination and need not exercise deliberative capacities.)
    Justified true belief — true belief that has been arrived at through the exercise of deliberative capacities, including comparison of and deliberation among alternatives.
    necessity(Auriol's modal theory of future contingents)
    The property of necessarily being the way something is; equivalent to immutability in Auriol's modal theory

    Connections

    1 topic

    Free Will & Foreknowledge1 linked

    Related

    All attempts to save meaningful contingency governed by human free will are doom...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective