Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Harry Frankfurt's work on higher-order desires demonstrat... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→Sinners would not be able to retain forever their libertarian freedom to continue separating themselves from the divine nature and from the ultimate source of human happiness.

    Harry Frankfurt's work on higher-order desires demonstrates that agents can freely endorse first-order desires that external observers deem self-destructive, without thereby losing authentic autonomous agency.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    1 reason for
    1 reason against

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Autonomy requires second-order endorsement of desires, not external assessment of their consequences or rationality.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.People can have compelling reasons to pursue self-destructive goals (sacrifice, principle, meaning) that reflect authentic values.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Denying autonomy based on outcome paternalism undermines respect for persons as self-governing agents with their own priorities.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Higher-order endorsement can itself be compromised by manipulation, addiction, or distorted reasoning the agent doesn't recognize.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Frankfurt's account lacks criteria distinguishing authentic endorsement from internalized compulsion or false consciousness.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Autonomy plausibly requires some minimal capacity for recognizing harms; endorsing destructive desires may indicate epistemic failure.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    Key Terms

    Authentic(as used in ethics)
    Genuine or real; in this case, morality that comes from your own true choice rather than from external pressure or obvious reward.
    First-order desires(in philosophy of action and autonomy)
    What you directly want to do or have right now—like wanting to eat chocolate or wanting to sleep in.
    Harry Frankfurt(as a modern philosopher referenced in debates about God's power)
    A 20th-century American philosopher who wrote about the nature of God's omnipotence and whether an all-powerful being can be limited by its own nature.
    Higher-order desires(as a key concept in Frankfurt's theory)
    Desires about your desires—like wanting to want something, or wanting to stop wanting something. For example, wanting to want to exercise, or wanting to stop wanting junk food.
    Self-destructive(as describing the kind of desires an external observer might judge negatively)
    Harmful to yourself; actions or desires that damage your own wellbeing or work against your own interests.
    autonomous agency(as used in ethics and philosophy of action)
    Your ability to make decisions for yourself based on your own reasoning and values, without outside control.

    Connections

    2 topics

    Eternal Conscious Torment1 linkedAfterlife & Death1 linked

    Related

    Autonomy plausibly requires some minimal capacity for recognizing harms; endorsi...Autonomy requires second-order endorsement of desires, not external assessment o...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    2 (1 for, 1 against)
    Edits
    1 edit
    Denying autonomy based on outcome paternalism undermines respect for persons as ...
    Frankfurt's account lacks criteria distinguishing authentic endorsement from int...
    +3 moreShow less
    Higher-order endorsement can itself be compromised by manipulation, addiction, o...People can have compelling reasons to pursue self-destructive goals (sacrifice, ...Sinners would not be able to retain forever their libertarian freedom to continu...