Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    If Absolute Idealism cannot console, by the same logic it... — Carmelics
    Home/Moral Responsibility
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→Absolute Idealism cannot supply a person with a reason to refrain from harming others when doing so would benefit that person.

    If Absolute Idealism cannot console, by the same logic it cannot motivate moral restraint.

    Moral ResponsibilityVirtue Ethics
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Moral ResponsibilityVirtue Ethics

    Connections

    4 topics

    Causation1 linked

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Moral Responsibility
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    Consciousness & Mind
    1 linked
    Religious Experience1 linked
    Skepticism1 linked

    Related

    A metaphysical fact that is never experienced cannot furnish a motivating reason...Absolute Idealism cannot supply a person with a reason to refrain from harming o...If Absolute Idealism is true, the harm one inflicts on another may metaphysicall...Russell's own argument establishes that Absolute Idealism provides no experienti...

    Similar

    Reason cannot be the motive to moral action79%The key difference between Kant and Hume on moral motivation is that K...78%Theoretical exercises of reason cannot be morally commanded76%Fundamental moral principles cannot be arrived at through reasoning, a...76%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: russell-moral
    View source passageHide passage
    Now this argument has an interesting corollary which Russell does not explicitly draw. It may be that in Reality the pains I inflict on you affect me—or at least a larger mind-like thing in which we both participate—but if I never experience those effects, how can this give me a motive to do or forbear if my interests conflict with yours? How can the fact that you and I are in Reality one (or at least part of one) give me a reason to look out for you, if this oneness is something I never experie

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective