Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    If God is not in time, then God does not have beliefs at ... — Carmelics
    Home/Free Will & Foreknowledge
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→Premise (1) misrepresents God's relation to time and should be rejected.

    If God is not in time, then God does not have beliefs at a time—God did not believe T yesterday, does not believe T today, and will not believe T tomorrow.

    Free Will & Foreknowledge
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Free Will & Foreknowledge

    Related

    God is not in time and has no temporal properties.Premise (1) misrepresents God's relation to time and should be rejected.Rather, all temporal events are before the mind of God in an atemporal present, ...Since God did not believe T yesterday, premise (1), which attributes a temporall...

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Free Will & Foreknowledge
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.

    Similar

    Since God did not believe T yesterday, premise (1), which attributes a...85%God is not in time and has no temporal properties.81%Since God infallibly believed yesterday that you will answer the phone...77%If T could turn out false and the belief that T could be incorrect, th...76%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: free-will-foreknowledge
    View source passageHide passage
    Let “God” designate a being who has infallible beliefs about the future, where to say that God believes p infallibly is to say that God believes p and it is not possible that God believes p and p is false. It is not important for the logic of the argument that God is the being worshiped by any particular religion, but the motive to maintain that there is a being with infallible beliefs is usually a religious one.

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective