Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    If intentions to try were the operative causal driver, ak... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→In a Bratman case, the agent's actions are driven by intentions to try to perform each action rather than intentions to perform each action outright

    If intentions to try were the operative causal driver, akratic action would be impossible, yet akrasia demonstrably occurs when agents act against their all-out evaluative judgments.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    1 reason for
    1 reason against

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Akratic agents demonstrate a gap between judgment and action, proving intentions alone don't determine behavior.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.If intentions were fully operative, agents couldn't act contrary to their best judgment by definition.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Empirical cases of weakness of will show competing motivational forces override rational intention.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Akratic action may involve conflicting intentions where a weaker intention operatively drives behavior.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.The claim equivocates between 'intentions to try' and actual operative intentions—agents may intend otherwise.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Demonstrating akrasia requires proving the agent truly intended their all-out judgment, which is disputed.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    Key Terms

    Causal driver(describing what might be responsible for structural similarities)
    The main thing that causes something else to happen; the primary reason or force behind an effect.
    Operative(describing the agent intellect as actively working)
    Actually working or functioning; in this context, it means 'actively at work' rather than just existing passively.
    akratic action / akrasia(ethics and philosophy of action)
    When you do something you know is bad for you or goes against what you've decided is best—like eating cake when you've committed to dieting. It's acting against your own better judgment.
    all-out evaluative judgments(ethics and philosophy of action)
    Your final, complete decision about what's best or most important to do when you consider everything—your overall sense of what you genuinely value most.
    intentions to try(philosophy of action)
    Your conscious decisions or commitments to make an effort to do something, like deciding 'I'm going to try to exercise more.'

    Connections

    2 topics

    Free Will & Foreknowledge1 linkedMoral Responsibility1 linked

    Related

    Akratic action may involve conflicting intentions where a weaker intention opera...Akratic agents demonstrate a gap between judgment and action, proving intentions...Demonstrating akrasia requires proving the agent truly intended their all-out ju...Empirical cases of weakness of will show competing motivational forces override ...
    +3 moreShow less
    If intentions were fully operative, agents couldn't act contrary to their best j...In a Bratman case, the agent's actions are driven by intentions to try to perfor...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    2 (1 for, 1 against)
    Edits
    1 edit
    The claim equivocates between 'intentions to try' and actual operative intention...