Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    It can only serve the damned, the non-damned, or God — Carmelics
    Home/Against an aspect of God
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→Such a continuation is inconsistent with the justice of God

    It can only serve the damned, the non-damned, or God

    Against an aspect of GodEternal Conscious Torment
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Against an aspect of GodEternal Conscious Torment

    Connections

    1 linked claim

    Such a continuation is inconsistent with the justice of God

    Related

    If the above is true, then it is not that there is a redemptive purpose in the c...

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Against an aspect of God
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    If there is a redemptive purpose, it must serve someone
    It is not that it serves any of those
    Such a continuation is inconsistent with the justice of God

    Similar

    It is not that it serves the non-damned88%If the above is true, then it serves the non-damned86%It is not that it serves the damned85%If the above is true, it is not that it serves the damned81%

    Source

    Mindmap

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit
    Notes

    <html> <head> </head> <body> <p> This set of arguments could be structured a number of different ways: as a set of counteracting rebuttals (first to the idea that it serves the damned, then to the idea that it serves the non-damned, then to the idea that it serves God), or as a set of individual arguments that are rebutted (It must serve someone=&gt;the only people it could serve is the damned, the non-damned, or God=&gt;it does not serve any of them (it is not that it serves the damned, it is not that it serves the non-damned, it is not that it serves God)). In situations like these, it may be that the positive version (the one posed here) is the one to be preferred. </p> </body> </html>

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective