Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    It is awkward to accept the main results of the ancient t... — Carmelics
    Home/Trinity
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→A doctrine of processions must be retained in trinitarian theology.

    It is awkward to accept the main results of the ancient trinitarian controversy while thinking that the developmental process had at its heart a fundamentally wrong assumption, namely that the Son and Spirit exist because of the Father.

    Trinity
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Trinity

    Key Terms

    Ontology(Carnap argues this enterprise is based on a mistake)
    The philosophical discipline that tries to answer hard questions about what there really is.
    The Father(theological reference)
    In Christian theology, God the creator, understood as the first person of the Trinity.
    The Son(theological reference)
    In Christian theology, Jesus Christ understood as the second person of the Trinity, the divine being who took human form.
    The Spirit

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Trinity
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    (theological reference)
    In Christian theology, the Holy Spirit, understood as the third person of the Trinity—often described as God's active presence or power in the world.
    Trinitarian controversy(historical/theological reference)
    A major debate in early Christianity (roughly 300s CE) about whether God the Father, Jesus the Son, and the Holy Spirit are three separate beings or one being in three forms, and how they relate to each other.
    Trinity
    # Trinity The Trinity is the Christian belief that God exists as three distinct persons—the Father, the Son (Jesus), and the Holy Spirit—while remaining one God. These three are understood as co-equal and eternal, working together as a unified divine being. This concept is central to most Christian denominations, though different traditions interpret and explain it in various ways.

    Related

    A doctrine of processions must be retained in trinitarian theology.The doctrine of processions enjoys significant support from scripture.

    Similar

    Van Inwagen's impure relative identity trinitarianism is inadequate.78%Van Inwagen's theory has not demonstrated the consistency of trinitari...77%Swinburne's theory of the Trinity should be rejected or is seriously p...76%Popular Latin trinitarianism is incoherent75%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: trinity
    View source passageHide passage
    For Hasker, the Persons of the Trinity are three divine selves (Chapters 22–5). Against a modern Protestant trend, Hasker insists that a doctrine of processions must be retained, arguing that it enjoys “significant support” from scripture (217), and he points out the awkwardness accepting “the main results of the [ancient] trinitarian controversy” while thinking that this “developmental process…had at its heart a fundamentally wrong assumption”, that is, that the Son and Spirit exist because of the Father (222–3).

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective