Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that It is not irrational to prefer not to be at the end of our lives, unable to shape them further, and limited to reminiscing about days gone by.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
2 perspectives
Reason for 1 of 2
?
1.
Contemplative traditions from Aristotle to Buddhism hold that retrospective wisdom and equanimity constitute a distinct and valuable form of human flourishing.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
If late-life reflection constitutes a genuine mode of flourishing, then preferring to avoid it may reflect a culturally contingent bias toward productivity rather than rational assessment.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reason for 2 of 2
?
1.
Bernard Williams's argument that categorical desires ground the badness of death implies that transformed late-life desires—including desires to reminisce—are no less authentically one's own.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
If reminiscence and passive reflection can constitute genuine categorical desires, then the supporting argument's privileging of forward-looking pursuits begs the question against a different but equally coherent life structure.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
We do not want our lives to be all over with.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
We have forward-looking pursuits that require future life to be realized.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.