Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    It remains logically possible for an immutable God to hav... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Divine Attributes
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→The future is necessary ex suppositione (conditionally necessary), though not absolutely necessary

    It remains logically possible for an immutable God to have known otherwise (absolute necessity does not follow)

    Divine AttributesModality & Possibility
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Divine AttributesModality & Possibility

    Connections

    1 topic

    Free Will & Foreknowledge3 linked

    Related

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Divine Attributes
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    God has immutable knowledge of the futureThe future is necessary ex suppositione (conditionally necessary), though not ab...Whatever God knows cannot fail to occur, given that knowledge

    Similar

    God must be immutable (harboring no unrealized potentialities).82%God is immutable with respect to existence.81%If the Principle of Identity of Indiscernibles holds of necessity, the...80%Aquinas similarly holds that God is immutable yet His relations with o...80%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: gregory-rimini
    View source passageHide passage
    Gregory’s position relies on interesting uses of common logical devices and distinctions developed at Paris and Oxford over the preceding century, such as the distinction between the composite and divided senses of propositions, and that between conditional and absolute necessity. The purpose of these distinctions was to offer a way of explaining the contingency of events, but in doing so they assumed the ultimate contingency of everything except God. However, far from being an affirmation of th

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective