Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Korsgaard's account is ambiguous about whether the self-r... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Moral Responsibility
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→If the self-reflection grounding moral obligation is idealized, then everyday reflective choice is insufficient to confer moral status.

    Korsgaard's account is ambiguous about whether the self-reflection grounding obligation is idealized or ordinary.

    Moral ResponsibilityTruth & Knowledge
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Moral ResponsibilityTruth & Knowledge

    Connections

    1 topic

    Rights & Liberty1 linked

    Related

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Moral Responsibility
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    If the relevant capacity is the idealized ability to reflect rationally in a ful...If the self-reflection grounding moral obligation is idealized, then everyday re...Moral status on this view would require the more rarified rational capacity, not...

    Similar

    If the self-reflection grounding moral obligation is idealized, then e...82%Moral status tracks the degree to which one possesses the reflective c...74%Secondary reflection is the appropriate mode of reflection for underst...74%Equal moral status cannot be grounded in reflective capacity alone, be...74%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: autonomy-moral
    View source passageHide passage
    The move that must be made here, I think, picks up on Korsgaard’s gloss on Kantianism and the argument that our reflective capacities ultimately ground our obligations to others and, in turn, others’ obligations to regard us as moral equals. Arneson argues, however, that people surely vary in this capacity as well — the ability to reflectively consider options and choose sensibly from among them. Recall what we said above concerning the ambiguities of Korsgaard’s account concerning the degree to

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective