Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that Moore's proof being non-transmissive is compatible with the claim that a subject does acquire justification for the perceptual premise by undergoing the relevant perceptual experience.

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Non-transmission means justification cannot be transmitted through the argument to the conclusion, not that the premises lack justification.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Wright holds that subjects possess a special non-evidential justification called entitlement for accepting cornerstones such as Q8.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.If a subject has entitlement for Q8 and learns the perceptual evidence, the subject does acquire justification for the perceptual premise.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.