Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    No one could reasonably reject an equal-premium insurance... — Carmelics
    Home/Social Contract
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→A contractualist can justify equal insurance premiums without prior knowledge of one's condition because such an agreement could not be reasonably rejected.

    No one could reasonably reject an equal-premium insurance scheme given uncertainty about their own future condition.

    Social Contract
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Social Contract

    Related

    A contractualist can justify equal insurance premiums without prior knowledge of...Contractualism evaluates agreements by whether they can be reasonably rejected, ...

    Similar

    A contractualist can justify equal insurance premiums without prior kn...

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Social Contract
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    80%
    The contractualist justification for the equal-premium insurance schem...76%
    If the argument from reasonable rejectability justifies insurance agai...76%
    Under contractualism, a principle is impermissible if any individual h...68%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: contractarianism
    View source passageHide passage
    Disability rights activists, however, would still seem to have a serious complaint to lodge against normative contractarianism, since it is surely the case that there are persons who cannot reciprocate benefits to others. Such persons would be, on the normative contractarian view, beyond the scope of the rules of justice. Recent literature on disability argues that, to the contrary, contractarianism can be inclusive of the disabled. For example, it may be argued that in fact most disabled person

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective