Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Objects persist through time by having temporal parts (pe... — Carmelics
    Home/Personal Identity
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Objects persist through time by having temporal parts (perdurantism)

    Personal Identity
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    1 reason for
    2 reasons against

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Special Theory of Relativity (STR) shows space to be much like time
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Objects extend in space by having spatial parts
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    2 perspectives
    Reason against 1 of 2
    ?
    • 1.STR is compatible with endurantism if objects persist by being wholly present at each relativistic frame-relative hyperplane of simultaneity.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.The analogy between space and time breaks down because spatial extension is simultaneous whereas temporal extension is not, making 'having a part at t' fundamentally unlike 'having a part at location l'.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reason against 2 of 2
    ?
    • 1.Temporal parts entail that there are distinct, momentary entities bearing properties like 'being in pain,' yet our best psychological and moral practices attribute suffering to persisting persons, not instantaneous stages.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.If perdurantism is true, personal identity over time reduces to relations between stages, but Chisholm and van Inwagen argue no such purely relational account can ground the strict numerical identity that rationality and moral responsibility require.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    Topics

    Personal Identity

    Connections

    1 topic

    Modality & Possibility1 linked

    Related

    If perdurantism is true, personal identity over time reduces to relations betwee...Objects extend in space by having spatial partsSTR is compatible with endurantism if objects persist by being wholly present at...Special Theory of Relativity (STR) shows space to be much like time
    +2 moreShow less
    Temporal parts entail that there are distinct, momentary entities bearing proper...The analogy between space and time breaks down because spatial extension is simu...

    Similar

    Perdurantists distinguish two ways of talking about persisting things:...82%If things have temporal parts if and only if the past and the future e...81%The claim that things have temporal parts if and only if the past and ...77%There is a connection between theories of time and theories of persist...76%

    Source

    AI-extracted1/3 agreementValid
    SEP: temporal-parts
    View source passageHide passage
    A first argument from STR to perdurantism goes as follows: STR shows space to be much like time, objects extend in space by having spatial parts, so objects persist through time by having temporal parts.  But this argument is weak: although STR does show space to be like time in some respects, the theory does still differentiate between spatial and temporal dimensions. Even if it did not, we would need some further reason to believe that persistence must be just like spatial extension.
    Extraction notes

    Validity: Extracted via Max plan + API grounding/validity checks

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    3 (1 for, 2 against)
    Edits
    1 edit