Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that Paul Helm's defense of timeless foreknowledge concedes that timeless knowledge is 'accidentally necessary' relative to any temporal vantage point, preserving the very modal constraint the timelessness solution was designed to dissolve.

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.'Accidentally necessary' relativity may not threaten libertarian freedom if necessity only obtains from temporal, not atemporal, standpoints.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Helm's 'modal constraint' critique assumes contingency requires freedom from all logical entailment, a standard stronger than required for human agency.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Timeless knowledge avoids temporal determination of the future even if outcomes are logically necessitated—addressing the core intuition behind timelessness.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Timeless knowledge must be logically consistent with all temporal facts, making certain divine knowledge states necessarily true from any perspective.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Helm correctly identifies that 'accidental necessity' still constrains modal freedom, undermining timelessness as a genuine solution to foreknowledge.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.If God's timeless knowledge entails facts about future human choices, those choices cannot be genuinely contingent—defeating the original motivation.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.