Pelagius and later Arminius argued that divine justice requires that no soul be condemned for a sin it had no volitional participation in, a position with robust support in the Reformed tradition's own internal debates.

?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

Arminius(as a historical philosopher with similar views to Pelagius): A Dutch theologian from the 1500s who argued that God's predestination (deciding who goes to heaven) must work together with human free will, not against it.
Pelagius(as a historical philosopher referenced in debates about sin and responsibility): A Christian theologian from around 400 AD who argued that humans have free will and are responsible for their own sins, rather than being bound by inherited guilt from Adam.
Reformed tradition(as the theological framework within which this debate occurs): A branch of Christianity that started with John Calvin and emphasizes God's sovereignty and predestination; it includes various Protestant churches.
Robust support(as describing how much support this position had within Reformed theology): Strong, widespread, or well-developed backing or agreement for an idea.

Based on where you are in your exploration