Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Political liberal Rawlsians cannot justify Fair Equality ... — Carmelics
    Home/Rights & Liberty
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Political liberal Rawlsians cannot justify Fair Equality of Opportunity

    Rights & LibertySocial Contract
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    0 reasons for
    1 reason against

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Taylor's defense of FEO is overly perfectionist
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Overly perfectionist arguments are not compatible with political liberalism
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.If FEO can only be justified via perfectionist reasoning, political liberals cannot endorse FEO
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Rights & LibertySocial Contract

    Connections

    2 topics

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.
    Democracy & Governance2 linkedVirtue Ethics1 linked

    Related

    If FEO can only be justified via perfectionist reasoning, political liberals can...Overly perfectionist arguments are not compatible with political liberalismTaylor's defense of FEO is overly perfectionist

    Similar

    If FEO can only be justified via perfectionist reasoning, political li...81%Herbert Spencer deserves greater attention in contemporary liberal uti...71%Mill's liberal principles do not apply to individuals who lack suitabl...70%Mill's perfectionist justification of liberal essentials contrasts wit...69%

    Source

    AI-extracted1/3 agreementValid
    SEP: equal-ed-opportunity
    View source passageHide passage
    On her view, the social bases of self-respect require the robust anti-discrimination principle that FEO provides. In defense of Rawls on the second objection, Robert Taylor (2004) has attempted to show that self-realization has a crucial place in the hierarchy of goods on the Kantian interpretation of Rawls’ principles. He claims that FEO therefore has priority over the difference principle because it regulates goods that are more central to the exercise of our moral powers and our highest order
    Extraction notes

    Validity: Extracted via Max plan + API grounding/validity checks

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    1 (0 for, 1 against)
    Edits
    1 edit