Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that Quine's critique of analyticity shows that no non-trivial universal generalization is insulated from empirical revision by meaning alone.

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Some statements like 'triangles have three sides' appear analytically true by definition regardless of holistic belief revision—their negation seems conceptually incoherent.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Quine's holism conflates *practical revisability* (we could revise anything) with *conceptual insulation from experience*, which are distinct properties.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Mathematical and logical truths demonstrate meaning-based insulation: no empirical discovery could make 'if p then p' false without changing what we mean by the logical connectives.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Quine showed through thought experiments that statements like 'bachelors are unmarried' can be abandoned if empirical evidence sufficiently pressures our total belief system.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.The analytic/synthetic distinction assumes meaning determines truth independently of experience, but meaning itself is holistically determined by our entire network of beliefs.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.If a statement's truth could be insulated by meaning alone, we couldn't explain why we revise even central logical and mathematical beliefs under empirical pressure.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.