Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Relations of recognition, identification, flourishing, me... — Carmelics
    Home/Virtue Ethics
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→Resistance to domination is not reducible to resignifying within oppressive structures.

    Relations of recognition, identification, flourishing, meaning, love, empowerment, and solidarity exist beyond mere oppressive power structures.

    Rights & LibertyVirtue Ethics
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Virtue EthicsRights & Liberty

    Connections

    2 topics

    Social Contract2 linked

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Virtue Ethics
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    Modality & Possibility
    1 linked

    Related

    Feminist movements, women's studies programs, lesbian communities, and alternati...If women have been produced as something other than subjected, then transformati...Resistance to domination is not reducible to resignifying within oppressive stru...

    Similar

    This recognition is expressed in loyalty to one's rational values and ...77%Feminism must exist both independently and as part of a broader strugg...76%Socialization alone does not constitute oppression, even though social...74%A person cannot conceive of their own flourishing without conceiving o...73%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: femapproach-analy-cont
    View source passageHide passage
    Seyla Benhabib (1995), Amy Allen (2008) and Allison Weir (2013) also question equations between identity, law and power. Benhabib distinguishes between a stronger and a weaker version of the claim that identities such as women and gay people are constructions of power (1995, 20). The stronger version insists that subjects are entirely the effects of power, particularly of a compulsory heterosexuality, and that as effects they can only accept their mode of being a subject or try to subvert it fro

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective