Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Repeated Prisoner's Dilemmas have many Nash equilibria th... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Modality & Possibility
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→Experimental subjects in one-shot Prisoner's Dilemma settings initially cooperate because they treat the game as a repeated Prisoner's Dilemma

    Repeated Prisoner's Dilemmas have many Nash equilibria that involve cooperation rather than defection

    Modality & PossibilityTruth & Knowledge
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Modality & PossibilityTruth & Knowledge

    Connections

    1 topic

    Causation3 linked

    Related

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Modality & Possibility
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    Experimental subjects in one-shot Prisoner's Dilemma settings initially cooperat...People apply strategies learned from repeated games when placed into a structura...People rarely encounter one-shot Prisoner's Dilemmas in everyday life but freque...

    Similar

    Pure Coordination games may have multiple equilibria.78%The Prisoner's Dilemma has a unique Nash equilibrium (joint confession...75%Miscommunication causes repeated-game cooperative equilibria to unrave...74%Team reasoning alone does not distinguish between equilibria in Pure C...73%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: game-theory
    View source passageHide passage
    The paradox of backward induction, like the puzzles raised by equilibrium refinement, is mainly a problem for those who view game theory as contributing to a normative theory of rationality (specifically, as contributing to that larger theory the theory of strategic rationality). The non-psychological game theorist can give a different sort of account of apparently “irrational” play and the prudence it encourages. This involves appeal to the empirical fact that actual agents, including people, m

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective