Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    The argument relies on treating a folksy paraphrase as me... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Philosophy of Language
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→The 'argument by paraphrase' from Counterfactuals is insufficient to establish Lewis's form of modal realism

    The argument relies on treating a folksy paraphrase as metaphysically revealing, which may merely be a careless manner of speaking

    Modality & PossibilityPhilosophy of Language
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Philosophy of LanguageModality & Possibility

    Related

    Folksy abstraction principles like the paraphrase used could be hiding a contrad...The 'argument by paraphrase' from Counterfactuals is insufficient to establish L...The argument does little to show that other possible worlds are concreta, since ...

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Philosophy of Language
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.

    Similar

    The 'argument by paraphrase' from Counterfactuals is insufficient to e...79%Lewis provides vanishingly little defence of why that paraphrase is pe...77%A good paraphrase must capture what speakers actually mean.76%Whiting's defense of semantic obligations via the possibility of criti...75%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: david-lewis
    View source passageHide passage
    The little ‘argument by paraphrase’ from Counterfactuals is a long way from an argument for Lewis’s form of modal realism. For one thing, the argument relies on taking a folksy paraphrase as metaphysically revealing; perhaps we would be better off treating this as just a careless manner of speaking. For another, the folksy paraphrase Lewis uses isn’t obviously innocuous; like many other abstraction principles it could be hiding a contradiction. And the argument does little to show that other pos

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective