Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    The Barcan Formula (BF) is valid in Simplest Quantified M... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Modality & Possibility
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    The Barcan Formula (BF) is valid in Simplest Quantified Modal Logic (SQML)

    Modality & Possibility
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    1 reason for
    2 reasons against

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.In the model theory of SQML, the possibility operator ◇ is literally an existential quantifier ranging over all possible worlds
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.In evaluating an existentially quantified formula ∃νφ at a possible world w, the quantifier ∃ν ranges unrestrictedly over all individuals
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.When two existential quantifiers range over independent domains, switching their order does not alter the truth value of the formula
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    2 perspectives
    Reason against 1 of 2
    ?
    • 1.SQML's constant domain assumption—that every individual exists in every possible world—is a substantive metaphysical commitment, not a logical truth.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Once variable domains are permitted (as in Kripke's 1963 semantics), the universal instantiation axiom fails and BF is no longer valid.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.The validity of BF in SQML therefore reflects a built-in possibilist ontology, not a discovery about modal logic as such.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reason against 2 of 2
    ?
    • 1.Kripke argued that BF's converse entails that actually existing individuals are necessarily possible, but BF itself entails that possible individuals actually exist—a commitment many find ontologically profligate.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.If modal logic is to serve as a neutral framework for metaphysical inquiry, its theorems should not prejudge first-order disputes about what exists across worlds.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    Topics

    Modality & Possibility

    Connections

    1 topic

    Philosophy of Language1 linked

    Related

    If modal logic is to serve as a neutral framework for metaphysical inquiry, its ...In evaluating an existentially quantified formula ∃νφ at a possible world w, the...In the model theory of SQML, the possibility operator ◇ is literally an existent...Kripke argued that BF's converse entails that actually existing individuals are ...
    +4 moreShow less
    Once variable domains are permitted (as in Kripke's 1963 semantics), the univers...SQML's constant domain assumption—that every individual exists in every possible...The validity of BF in SQML therefore reflects a built-in possibilist ontology, n...When two existential quantifiers range over independent domains, switching their...

    Similar

    The Converse Barcan Formula (CBF) is invalid in KQML87%□N is invalid in KQML's semantics80%CBF is invalid in KQML's semantics80%BF is invalid in KQML's semantics80%

    Source

    AI-extracted1/3 agreementValid
    SEP: possibilism-actualism
    View source passageHide passage
    That is, informally, if there could be something satisfying any given description \(\varphi,\) then there is something that could satisfy that description, a thing that is possibly \(\varphi.\) The validity of BF in SQML rests on two facts: first, that in the model theory of SQML (as in all varieties of possible world semantics), the possibility operator \(\Diamond\) is literally an existential quantifier ranging over all possible worlds; and second, that, in evaluating an existentially quan
    Extraction notes

    Validity: Extracted via Max plan + API grounding/validity checks

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    3 (1 for, 2 against)
    Edits
    1 edit