Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that The claim that the separatist about grounding explanation incurs no new debt is undermined by the fact that the quasi-causal model is not the only model of metaphysical explanation.

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.The analogy between grounding explanation and causal explanation assumes a quasi-causal model of metaphysical explanation.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.The quasi-causal model of metaphysical explanation is not the only available model.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Distinguishing causation from causal explanation is itself a substantive philosophical commitment, not a neutral starting point.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Causation
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.