Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    The desires expressed by 'Would that everybody desired X!... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Philosophy of Language
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→'X is good' said by one person and 'X is bad' said by another person contradict each other

    The desires expressed by 'Would that everybody desired X!' and 'Would that everybody desired that not-X!' are not compossible, except under the condition that everyone holds inconsistent desires (both for X and for not-X)

    Modality & PossibilityPhilosophy of Language
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Philosophy of LanguageModality & Possibility

    Key Terms

    Conditional desires(as used in philosophy of mind)
    Wishes or wants that depend on certain conditions being met, like 'Would that X were true' (expressing a desire for X to happen).
    Inconsistent desires(as used in philosophy of mind and ethics)
    Wanting two opposite things at the same time—like wanting to eat cake and also wanting to stay on a diet simultaneously.
    Modal logic

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Philosophy of Language
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    (logic)
    A system of logic that deals with concepts like possibility, necessity, and what could or must be true.
    compossible(Russell's criterion for consistency among desires in his emotivist moral theory)
    Capable of being realized simultaneously; two desires are compossible if they can both be fulfilled at the same time

    Connections

    1 topic

    Truth & Knowledge1 linked

    Related

    'X is bad' means 'Would that everybody desired that not-X!''X is good' means 'Would that everybody desired X!''X is good' said by one person and 'X is bad' said by another person contradict ...

    Similar

    Two optatives that express non-compossible desires contradict each oth...78%Desires can be inconsistent with one another when they are not composs...75%Bratman's account of shared intention is defective because intentions ...74%Bratman's account of shared intention is defective because intentions ...74%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: russell-moral
    View source passageHide passage
    Again, Russell’s brand of emotivism is immune to this objection. According to Russell, “X is good” and “X is bad” are really in the optative mood despite their indicative appearances. As such, they express desires or wishes, and desires and wishes can, in a sense, be inconsistent with one other, namely when they are not (in Russell’s phrase) “compossible”, that is, when they cannot both be realized. “Would that I had all the ice-cream!” said by me and “Would that I had all the ice-cream!” said b

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective