Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    The only remaining strategy is to find a mental attitude ... — Carmelics
    Home/Moral Responsibility
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→The desire to act in accordance with reasons is the mental attitude fit to play the role of the agent.

    The only remaining strategy is to find a mental attitude the agent cannot disown.

    Free Will & ForeknowledgeMoral Responsibility
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Moral ResponsibilityFree Will & Foreknowledge

    Connections

    2 topics

    Consciousness & Mind3 linked

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Moral Responsibility
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    Causation
    1 linked

    Related

    A mental attitude that cannot be disowned is, functionally speaking, the agent.Irreducible agent-causation is not an acceptable solution.The desire to act in accordance with reasons is a mental attitude the agent cann...The desire to act in accordance with reasons is the mental attitude fit to play ...
    +1 moreShow less
    The standard theory fails because agents can disown the mental attitudes it posi...

    Similar

    A mental attitude that cannot be disowned is, functionally speaking, t...86%The desire to act in accordance with reasons is a mental attitude the ...84%There must be an attitude that can be identified with the agent's poin...79%The desire to act in accordance with reasons is the mental attitude fi...77%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: agency
    View source passageHide passage
    According to Velleman (1992), Frankfurt’s observation that an agent may fail to identify with a particular motive points to a fundamental flaw in the standard theory. As it seems always possible that an agent “disowns” the mental attitudes that cause an action, those attitudes do not “add up to the agent’s being involved” (1992: 463). This shows, according to Velleman, that the standard theory captures, at best, actions that are defective. It fails, in particular, to capture “human action par ex

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective