Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    The premises of the ontological argument for the immortal... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Afterlife & Death
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    The premises of the ontological argument for the immortality of the soul are compatible with Aristotle's analysis of movement

    Afterlife & DeathNatural Theology
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    1 reason for
    0 reasons against

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Aristotle's analysis holds that movement is necessarily an irreflexive relation
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.The Neoplatonic commentators interpret 'movement' in Aristotle's analysis as referring exclusively to physical movement
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.The self-movement of the soul is not physical movement and therefore falls outside Aristotle's analysis of movement
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Afterlife & DeathNatural Theology

    Connections

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Afterlife & Death
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.

    2 topics

    Causation2 linkedConsciousness & Mind1 linked

    Related

    Aristotle's analysis holds that movement is necessarily an irreflexive relationThe Neoplatonic commentators interpret 'movement' in Aristotle's analysis as ref...The self-movement of the soul is not physical movement and therefore falls outsi...

    Similar

    If the premises of the ontological argument for immortality are implie...90%The ontological argument claims that because the idea of God includes ...78%Aristotle's cosmological argument in Physics 8.5 may be read as provin...78%Aristotle agreed with Plato that the rational soul is immortal and the...78%

    Source

    AI-extracted1/3 agreementValid
    SEP: byzantine-philosophy
    View source passageHide passage
    Even if we cannot definitively clear him of this charge, we may be able to point to extenuating circumstances. The Neoplatonic commentators, too, espouse the ontological argument for the immortality of the soul. They also accept Aristotle’s analysis of movement as necessarily an irreflexive relation; they believe, however, that “movement” in this context refers exclusively to physical movement, and thus that the analysis does not concern the self-movement of the soul. That is to say, they affirm
    Extraction notes

    Validity: Extracted via Max plan + API grounding/validity checks

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    1 (1 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit