Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    The self-movement of the soul is not physical movement an... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Afterlife & Death
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→The premises of the ontological argument for the immortality of the soul are compatible with Aristotle's analysis of movement

    The self-movement of the soul is not physical movement and therefore falls outside Aristotle's analysis of movement

    Afterlife & DeathConsciousness & Mind
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Afterlife & DeathConsciousness & Mind

    Connections

    2 topics

    Causation2 linked

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Afterlife & Death
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    Natural Theology
    1 linked

    Related

    Aristotle's analysis holds that movement is necessarily an irreflexive relationThe Neoplatonic commentators interpret 'movement' in Aristotle's analysis as ref...The premises of the ontological argument for the immortality of the soul are com...

    Similar

    Alcmaeon likely assigned continual motion but not self-motion to the s...83%The soul does not move itself82%Bodily motion cannot directly act on the soul as a physical cause82%The soul must itself be in motion81%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: byzantine-philosophy
    View source passageHide passage
    Even if we cannot definitively clear him of this charge, we may be able to point to extenuating circumstances. The Neoplatonic commentators, too, espouse the ontological argument for the immortality of the soul. They also accept Aristotle’s analysis of movement as necessarily an irreflexive relation; they believe, however, that “movement” in this context refers exclusively to physical movement, and thus that the analysis does not concern the self-movement of the soul. That is to say, they affirm

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective