Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that The premises of the ontological argument for the immortality of the soul are compatible with Aristotle's analysis of movement

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Aristotle's analysis holds that movement is necessarily an irreflexive relation
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.The Neoplatonic commentators interpret 'movement' in Aristotle's analysis as referring exclusively to physical movement
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.The self-movement of the soul is not physical movement and therefore falls outside Aristotle's analysis of movement
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42