Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that The proposition 'Every German philosopher is European' is universally valid with respect to the idea [philosopher]
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
2 perspectives
Reason for 1 of 2
?
1.
Universal validity requires substitution to preserve logical form, but 'philosopher' is not a purely logical idea in Bolzano's own framework.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
If 'philosopher' carries substantive content, its substitution may alter the proposition's truth-conditions rather than merely its extension.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Therefore, variation with respect to 'philosopher' tests empirical co-extension, not logical validity in Bolzano's intended sense.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reason for 2 of 2
?
1.
Quine's critique of analyticity shows that no non-trivial universal generalization is insulated from empirical revision by meaning alone.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
The claim that all substitutions for 'philosopher' preserve truth assumes a stable, meaning-fixed extension immune to such revision.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
A non-European thinker meeting all criteria for 'German philosopher' would falsify the proposition, making it empirically contingent rather than universally valid.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Every German is European
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
A proposition is universally valid with respect to a sequence of ideas if it holds for all substitutions of those ideas
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.