Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that The Sinn of 'Hesperus' differs from the Sinn of 'Phosphorus'
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
2 perspectives
Reason for 1 of 2
?
1.
Names are rigid designators that contribute only their referent to semantic content, not descriptive modes of presentation (Kripke, Naming and Necessity).
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
If names lack descriptive content, 'Hesperus' and 'Phosphorus' have identical semantic values, making distinct Sinne explanatorily idle.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reason for 2 of 2
?
1.
The cognitive difference between 'Hesperus is Hesperus' and 'Hesperus is Phosphorus' is explained by differences in context of utterance and speaker psychology, not in semantic Sinn (Salmon, Frege's Puzzle).
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Positing distinct Sinne for coreferential names conflates the epistemic situation of speakers with the objective semantic structure of language.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Two names can present the same Bedeutung in different ways
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
'Hesperus' presents Venus as the evening star while 'Phosphorus' presents Venus as the morning star
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.