Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    The state's coercive scheme only extends to those within ... — Carmelics
    Home/Democracy & Governance
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→The requirement for egalitarian justification of state coercion is limited in scope by the territorial jurisdiction of the coercive scheme.

    The state's coercive scheme only extends to those within its territorial borders.

    Democracy & GovernanceSocial Contract
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Democracy & GovernanceSocial Contract

    Connections

    1 topic

    Rights & Liberty2 linked

    Related

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Democracy & Governance
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    The case for strong equality or the difference principle is triggered by the sta...The requirement for egalitarian justification of state coercion is limited in sc...

    Similar

    The state does not massively coerce those outside its territorial bord...88%The requirement for egalitarian justification of state coercion is lim...85%The state massively coerces individuals residing within its claimed ju...83%The fact that a particular state coerces a person does not establish a...83%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: egalitarianism
    View source passageHide passage
    Another view is that the state massively coerces individuals residing within its claimed jurisdiction and does not to the same extent massively coerce those outside its territorial borders. The imposition of this massive coercion on individuals inside a nation is a presumptive violation of their autonomy, which demands a strong justification if state coercion is to be rightly deemed legitimate, morally permissible. It is plausible to suppose the required justification must include acknowledgemen

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective