Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that Theory choice is underdetermined by empirical evidence.

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons For

    2 perspectives
    Reason for 1 of 2
    ?
    • 1.Empirical evidence imposes genuine eliminative constraints: some theories are definitively falsified and cannot be rescued by auxiliary adjustments without absurdity.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Lakatos's methodology of scientific research programmes shows that progressive versus degenerative programmes are empirically distinguishable over time, defeating global underdetermination.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reason for 2 of 2
    ?
    • 1.Inference to the best explanation licenses theory choice on grounds of simplicity, coherence, and consilience that are themselves empirically calibrated virtues, not arbitrary preferences.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Boyd and Putnam argue that the predictive success of mature scientific theories is best explained by their approximate truth, making radical underdetermination epistemically self-undermining.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.In sciences like physics, hypotheses are not tested in isolation but only as part of whole bodies of theory.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Experiment in physics is dense with sophisticated instrumentation whose employment requires theoretical interpretation.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.When there is a conflict between theory and evidence, the fit can be restored in a multiplicity of different ways.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.