Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    There are circumstances in which health or money do not b... — Carmelics
    Home/Virtue Ethics
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→Money and health are not genuinely good — they are 'indifferents', neither good nor bad.

    There are circumstances in which health or money do not benefit their possessor (e.g., wealth spent on harmful things).

    Virtue Ethics
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Virtue Ethics

    Connections

    1 topic

    Truth & Knowledge1 linked

    Related

    If something fails to benefit its possessor in even some circumstances, it canno...

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Virtue Ethics
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    Money and health are not genuinely good — they are 'indifferents', neither good ...
    Whatever is genuinely good must benefit its possessor under all circumstances.

    Similar

    Happiness does not include health, pleasure, or wealth.79%Other goods such as health, wealth, good birth, beauty, justice, moder...75%If something fails to benefit its possessor in even some circumstances...75%Health, pleasure, and wealth are indifferent to happiness.74%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: stoicism
    View source passageHide passage
    The best way into the thicket of Stoic ethics is through the question of what is good, for all parties agree that possession of what is genuinely good secures a person’s happiness. The Stoics claim that whatever is good must benefit its possessor under all circumstances. But there are situations in which it is not to my benefit to be healthy or wealthy. (We may imagine that if I had money I would spend it on heroin which would not benefit me.) Thus, things like money are simply not good, in spit

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective