Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Whatever is genuinely good must benefit its possessor und... — Carmelics
    Home/Virtue Ethics
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Connected to 2 discussions

    Supports→Money and health are not genuinely good — they are 'indifferents', neither good nor bad.
    Supports→The virtues (prudence, justice, courage, moderation) are the only genuinely good things.

    Whatever is genuinely good must benefit its possessor under all circumstances.

    Virtue Ethics
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Virtue Ethics

    Connections

    2 topics

    No other argument is better1 linkedTruth & Knowledge1 linked

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Virtue Ethics
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.

    Related

    If something fails to benefit its possessor in even some circumstances, it canno...Money and health are not genuinely good — they are 'indifferents', neither good ...No other candidate goods (wealth, health) meet this criterion.The characteristic excellences of human beings benefit their possessor under all...
    +2 moreShow less
    The virtues (prudence, justice, courage, moderation) are the only genuinely good...There are circumstances in which health or money do not benefit their possessor ...

    Similar

    Possession of what is genuinely good secures a person's happiness.83%Nothing is good that cannot be desired.81%If something fails to benefit its possessor in even some circumstances...81%The good is invariably good — it cannot be used badly.80%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: stoicism
    View source passageHide passage
    The best way into the thicket of Stoic ethics is through the question of what is good, for all parties agree that possession of what is genuinely good secures a person’s happiness. The Stoics claim that whatever is good must benefit its possessor under all circumstances. But there are situations in which it is not to my benefit to be healthy or wealthy. (We may imagine that if I had money I would spend it on heroin which would not benefit me.) Thus, things like money are simply not good, in spit

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective