There is more at stake in Zeno's Achilles paradox than the fleetness of Achilles and the torpidity of tortoises; discovering facts about Achilles or the tortoise would not address the real issues presented by Zeno's argument.
Zeno's Achilles Paradox(the main subject of the statement)
An ancient Greek puzzle where the super-fast runner Achilles can never catch a slow tortoise because by the time Achilles reaches where the tortoise was, the tortoise has moved ahead—and this keeps happening infinitely.
paradox(R. M. Sainsbury's definition, presented as a target of criticism)
An apparently unacceptable conclusion derived by apparently acceptable reasoning from apparently acceptable premises
There’s more at stake here than the coherence of libertarian theism, as evidenced by the many non-libertarians and non-theists who have contributed to the debate. A comparison might be helpful. There’s more at stake in Zeno’s Achilles paradox than the fleetness of Achilles and the torpidity of tortoises. If that’s all there was to it, the discovery that Achilles was actually a quadraplegic, or that the tortoises of ancient Greece were as fast as jack rabbits, would resolve the puzzle. But that would simply exempt Achilles and/or the tortoise from complicity in the problem; it would do nothing ...