Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Therefore, ET-simultaneity never holds between an entity ... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Afterlife & Death
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→ET-simultaneity is not reflexive.

    Therefore, ET-simultaneity never holds between an entity and itself.

    Afterlife & Death
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Afterlife & Death

    Related

    Any given item is only one of temporal or eternal, not both.By definition, two items can only be ET-simultaneous if one is temporal and the ...ET-simultaneity is not reflexive.

    Similar

    Stump and Kretzmann's emphasis that simultaneity is a three-place rela...

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Afterlife & Death
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    82%
    ET-simultaneity is not reflexive.80%
    A-simultaneity is defined as occurring 'at the same now'.79%
    The difficulties with ET-simultaneity arise whether it is two-place or...79%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: eternity
    View source passageHide passage
    Since, by definition, two items can only be ET-simultaneous if one is temporal and the other eternal, and since any given item is only one of these, ET-simultaneity is not reflexive; in fact, it never holds between an entity and itself. Nor is it transitive; in fact, when x and y are ET-simultaneous and y and z are too, x and z never are. The non-transitivity of ET-simultaneity is needed to solve a pressing problem. If t is simultaneous with eternity, and eternity is simultaneous with \(t'\), then t is simultaneous with \(t'\). So, all times collapse into one:

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective