Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Any given item is only one of temporal or eternal, not both. — Carmelics
    Home/Afterlife & Death
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→ET-simultaneity is not reflexive.

    Any given item is only one of temporal or eternal, not both.

    Afterlife & Death
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Afterlife & Death

    Related

    By definition, two items can only be ET-simultaneous if one is temporal and the ...ET-simultaneity is not reflexive.Therefore, ET-simultaneity never holds between an entity and itself.

    Similar

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Afterlife & Death
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    By definition, two items can only be ET-simultaneous if one is tempora...87%
    God is temporal after creation, even if God was timeless before creati...80%
    God is timeless without creation and temporal with creation.78%
    God is eternal.77%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: eternity
    View source passageHide passage
    It has recently been suggested that there are actually two orthogonal issues regarding God’s relationship to time: (1) whether God is located in our spacetime—the spacetime investigated by modern physics; and (2) whether God is eternal or everlasting. (Note that this is the terminology not employed here.) God could be eternal, with a life that’s not marked by temporal succession, while being located at every spacetime point. Conversely, God could be everlasting while not located in physical spacetime at all (Murray & Rea 2008: Ch. 2).

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective