Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Therefore, positing noumenal freedom as causally efficaci... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→Free moral choice in the noumenal realm must nonetheless be capable of transforming the natural phenomenal world into a moral world.

    Therefore, positing noumenal freedom as causally efficacious in the phenomenal world generates an incoherence Kant's own first Critique prohibits.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    1 reason for
    1 reason against

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Kant's Critique establishes that noumena are unknowable and outside the spatio-temporal causal order that structures phenomenal experience.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.If noumenal freedom causally produces phenomenal effects, we would need to cognize the causal mechanism connecting two ontologically distinct realms.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Kant explicitly forbids transcendent knowledge claims about things-in-themselves, making noumenal causation epistemically prohibited.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Kant distinguishes between empirical causation (phenomenal) and transcendental freedom (noumenal), allowing both without one causing the other.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.The claim confuses causality-as-known (requiring spatio-temporal conditions) with causality-in-itself, which could operate outside phenomenal constraints.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Kant's practical philosophy requires noumenal freedom to ground moral responsibility; rejecting noumenal efficacy abandons his entire ethical framework.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    Connections

    2 topics

    Causation1 linkedFree Will & Foreknowledge1 linked

    Related

    Free moral choice in the noumenal realm must nonetheless be capable of transform...If noumenal freedom causally produces phenomenal effects, we would need to cogni...Kant distinguishes between empirical causation (phenomenal) and transcendental f...Kant explicitly forbids transcendent knowledge claims about things-in-themselves...
    +3 moreShow less
    Kant's Critique establishes that noumena are unknowable and outside the spatio-t...Kant's practical philosophy requires noumenal freedom to ground moral responsibi...The claim confuses causality-as-known (requiring spatio-temporal conditions) wit...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    2 (1 for, 1 against)
    Edits
    1 edit