Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    These tests apply rational evaluation to volitions and in... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Moral Responsibility
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→Kant's contradiction in conception and contradiction in will tests of the formula of universal law refute Hume's argument that passions, volitions, and actions cannot be evaluated as reasonable or unreasonable.

    These tests apply rational evaluation to volitions and intended actions.

    Moral Responsibility
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Moral Responsibility

    Connections

    2 topics

    Virtue Ethics2 linkedFree Will & Foreknowledge1 linked

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Moral Responsibility
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.

    Related

    If volitions and actions can be rationally evaluated via these tests, then Hume'...Kant's contradiction in conception and contradiction in will tests of the formul...Kant's formula of universal law provides two tests — contradiction in conception...

    Similar

    If volitions and actions can be rationally evaluated via these tests, ...85%A rational will operates by responding to what it takes to be reasons.76%One acts rationally when one acts for reasons that make it rational fo...76%A's choice of O1 is rational given the outcomes produced by each avail...74%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: kant-hume-morality
    View source passageHide passage
    The third argument claims that a passion is an “original existence”, not an idea, or a mental copy of another object. Contradiction to truth and reason “consists in the disagreement of ideas, consider’d as copies, with those objects, which they represent” (T 2.3.3.5). Therefore, a passion cannot be contrary to truth and reason. Passions cannot, strictly speaking, be evaluated as reasonable or unreasonable, despite our practice of calling passions unreasonable or irrational when they depend in so

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective