Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    This kind of manipulation is not ordinarily thought to ro... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Moral Responsibility
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→Manipulation of one person by another does not automatically undermine freedom

    This kind of manipulation is not ordinarily thought to rob a person of free will or the ability to act freely in the way required for moral responsibility

    Free Will & ForeknowledgeMoral Responsibility
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Moral ResponsibilityFree Will & Foreknowledge

    Related

    In real life, people may be manipulated by others through arguments or persuasio...Manipulation of one person by another does not automatically undermine freedomPeople believe they could have resisted the manipulative argument or persuasion

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Moral Responsibility
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    People may blame themselves later for not resisting, which presupposes they had ...

    Similar

    In manipulation cases, an unwitting victim is surreptitiously manipula...79%If people's intuitions that manipulated agents are not responsible tra...78%It is implausible to hold that immoral acts are not freely willed.78%In relatively clear cases of moral responsibility, the agent is not hy...77%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: incompatibilism-arguments
    View source passageHide passage
    It would be a mistake, however, to think that manipulation of one person by another automatically undermines freedom. In real life, we know that we may be manipulated by others to do things we would not have done, but for their arguments or other ways of persuading us to change our minds. Absent further reasons, we don’t think that this kind of manipulation robs us of free will or the ability to act freely in the way required for moral responsibility. We think that we could have resisted the arg

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective