Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    True beliefs count as knowledge only if they originate in... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Truth & Knowledge
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    True beliefs count as knowledge only if they originate in reliable sources.

    Truth & Knowledge
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    1 reason for
    2 reasons against

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Knowledge requires more than mere true belief.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.The reliability of the source of a belief is a necessary condition for that belief to constitute knowledge.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    2 perspectives
    Reason against 1 of 2
    ?
    • 1.Edmund Gettier demonstrated that reliably-formed true beliefs can still fail to constitute knowledge due to structural epistemic luck.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.If reliable origin were sufficient to distinguish knowledge from true belief, Gettier cases would not generate genuine counterexamples—but they do.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Therefore, reliability is neither sufficient nor clearly necessary once we recognize that epistemic justification involves conditions beyond causal origin.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reason against 2 of 2
    ?
    • 1.Laurence BonJour's coherentist objection holds that a belief can be epistemically justified through its coherence with a broader doxastic system, independent of source reliability.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.A clairvoyant who consistently forms true beliefs via an unverifiable faculty satisfies reliability conditions yet intuitively lacks knowledge on internalist grounds.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.This shows that reliability without internal epistemic access to one's grounds fails to capture the normative dimension that distinguishes knowledge from accidentally true belief.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    Topics

    Truth & Knowledge

    Key Terms

    knowledge(Distinguished from mere true belief, which may be the product of indoctrination and need not exercise deliberative capacities.)
    Justified true belief — true belief that has been arrived at through the exercise of deliberative capacities, including comparison of and deliberation among alternatives.

    Related

    A clairvoyant who consistently forms true beliefs via an unverifiable faculty sa...Edmund Gettier demonstrated that reliably-formed true beliefs can still fail to ...If reliable origin were sufficient to distinguish knowledge from true belief, Ge...Knowledge requires more than mere true belief.
    +4 moreShow less
    Laurence BonJour's coherentist objection holds that a belief can be epistemicall...The reliability of the source of a belief is a necessary condition for that beli...Therefore, reliability is neither sufficient nor clearly necessary once we recog...This shows that reliability without internal epistemic access to one's grounds f...

    Similar

    For a belief to count as knowledge, it must originate in sources we ha...93%The reliability of the source of a belief is a necessary condition for...88%If knowledge exists and knowledge is infallible, then not all beliefs ...87%If any belief may be false and knowledge requires infallibility, then ...86%

    Source

    AI-extracted1/3 agreementValid
    SEP: epistemology
    View source passageHide passage
    Beliefs arise in people for a wide variety of causes. Among them, we must list psychological factors such as desires, emotional needs, prejudice, and biases of various kinds. Obviously, when beliefs originate in sources like these, they don’t qualify as knowledge even if true. For true beliefs to count as knowledge, it is necessary that they originate in sources we have good reason to consider reliable. These are perception, introspection, memory, reason, and testimony. Let us briefly consider e
    Extraction notes

    Validity: Extracted via Max plan + API grounding/validity checks

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    3 (1 for, 2 against)
    Edits
    1 edit