Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that True beliefs count as knowledge only if they originate in reliable sources.

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons For

    2 perspectives
    Reason for 1 of 2
    ?
    • 1.Edmund Gettier demonstrated that reliably-formed true beliefs can still fail to constitute knowledge due to structural epistemic luck.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.If reliable origin were sufficient to distinguish knowledge from true belief, Gettier cases would not generate genuine counterexamples—but they do.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Therefore, reliability is neither sufficient nor clearly necessary once we recognize that epistemic justification involves conditions beyond causal origin.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reason for 2 of 2
    ?
    • 1.Laurence BonJour's coherentist objection holds that a belief can be epistemically justified through its coherence with a broader doxastic system, independent of source reliability.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.A clairvoyant who consistently forms true beliefs via an unverifiable faculty satisfies reliability conditions yet intuitively lacks knowledge on internalist grounds.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.This shows that reliability without internal epistemic access to one's grounds fails to capture the normative dimension that distinguishes knowledge from accidentally true belief.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Knowledge requires more than mere true belief.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.The reliability of the source of a belief is a necessary condition for that belief to constitute knowledge.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.