Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Truth can obtain in the simple operation of the intellect... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Philosophy of Language
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Truth can obtain in the simple operation of the intellect (apprehension of quiddities), not only in composite operations (composition and division).

    Philosophy of LanguageTruth & Knowledge
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    1 reason for
    0 reasons against

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.The intellectual apprehension of a quiddity is naturally in agreement with that quiddity.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Natural agreement with a thing is sufficient for a thought to be true.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Agreement (adequatio) with things is the criterion for a thought being true.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Philosophy of LanguageTruth & Knowledge

    Connections

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Philosophy of Language
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.

    1 topic

    Consciousness & Mind1 linked

    Related

    Agreement (adequatio) with things is the criterion for a thought being true.Natural agreement with a thing is sufficient for a thought to be true.The intellectual apprehension of a quiddity is naturally in agreement with that ...

    Similar

    Therefore, simple, non-composite acts of the intellect can be true.81%Simple intellectual apprehension of a quiddity is naturally in agreeme...78%The intellectual apprehension of a quiddity is naturally in agreement ...78%The primary object of intellection is a quiddity presented to the inte...77%

    Source

    AI-extracted1/3 agreementValid
    SEP: simon-faversham
    View source passageHide passage
    Simon accepts the common medieval definition of a true thought as one that is in agreement (adequatio) with things, an agreement determined by the way things are. However, unlike other thirteenth-century masters of arts (e.g., Robert Kilwardby and Radulphus Brito), Simon maintains that this agreement concerns the second, and composite, operation of the intellect—composition and division—as well as the first, and simple, one—the apprehension of quiddities (In Perih.: q.6). Hence, while other mast
    Extraction notes

    Validity: Extracted via Max plan + API grounding/validity checks

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    1 (1 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit