Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    VanArragon defines 'rejecting God' so broadly that any si... — Carmelics
    Home/Afterlife & Death
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→Persistent sinning without end would never result in anything like the traditional hell (whether understood as a lake of fire, the outer darkness, or any other condition revealing the full horror of separation from God).

    VanArragon defines 'rejecting God' so broadly that any sin for which one is morally responsible counts as rejecting God.

    Afterlife & DeathEternal Conscious Torment
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Afterlife & DeathEternal Conscious Torment

    Related

    Given VanArragon's understanding of libertarian freedom, continuing to sin forev...Persistent sinning without end would never result in anything like the tradition...Rejecting God in VanArragon's broad sense requires neither an awareness of God n...

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Afterlife & Death
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.

    Similar

    Original sin is a just basis for condemnation.81%Even though the perfectly loving God would never reject anyone, sinner...77%Therefore, in either case, it is not possible that S should reject the...75%God's judgment of sin is essentially a matter of permitting sinners to...73%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: heaven-hell
    View source passageHide passage
    So the idea of irreparable harm—that is, of harm that not even omnipotence could ever repair—is critical at this point. It is most relevant, perhaps, in cases where someone imagines sinners freely choosing annihilation (Kvanvig), or imagines them freely making a decisive and irreversible choice of evil (Walls), or imagines them freely locking the gates of hell from the inside (C. S. Lewis). But proponents of the so-called escapism understanding of hell can plausibly counter that hell is not necessarily an instance of such irreparable harm, and Raymond VanArragon in particular raises the possib...

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective